Sometimes, looking at something commonplace with new eyes,
new perspective, and new insight can be one of the hardest things there is to
do. And sometimes there is nothing more important to do. What can be more
commonplace than soil? We walk over it every day. Yet to dismiss its
importance, its power, is to miss a great deal. Sylvia Bernstein, in her book
Aquaponic Gardening, printed a quote from Kobus Jooste from South Africa that attempted
to strip down soil into its constituents, ending in the following conclusion:
“UBERFACT: Soil is an anchoring medium to plants that may or may not, over
time, release some of the stuff plants need to grow.” I nearly stopped reading
the book at that line, but powered on for the other wisdom the book has to
offer. Still, that sentence comes back to me often. Rarely have people been
more wrong.
The first thing to realize when looking at soil with new
eyes is that soil is a living thing. True, it is not a single organism, but
rather a complex media filled with tens of thousands of different organisms.
But the organisms work so well together that they can almost be treated as one
organism. So, when a biologist studies
an organism, what are the first couple of things they look for? Two of the most
important aspects in understanding an organism are what it eats, and what role
it fills in the ecosystem.
First let’s tackle the food source for soil. Yes, soil needs
to be fed. Like any other living organism, soil breathes air, drinks water, and
consumes a food source. In the absence of any of those, the soil will fail and
die. As for what soil eats, it is really simple. It eats whatever organic
matter falls to the soil surface. From there, through a series of digestive
processes of different organisms, the particles of decaying organic matter get
broken down into smaller and smaller pieces, the larger organic molecules
digested into smaller ones. Mass is lost as carbon from cellulose and lignin
and a host of other molecules are slowly turned into carbon dioxide. But the
process is so much more complex. The cellulose and lignin were locked in what
used to be the body of a plant, a plant that had metabolic processes and scent
and its own DNA. All of those complex molecules that created the things that
made the plant alive came with their own chemical signature. As they break
down, the carbon is lost to the air, as is some of the nitrogen. However, the
phosphorus and potassium and calcium and iron stay behind. They get recombined
and further broken down by that wonderful process of decomposition and soil
creation. What they finally create is exactly what the plants need to take up
and start all over again.
The pile of mostly decomposed plants in the background was living white clover two months earlier. The heat of summer killed them and the soil gobbled up the readily available food source. |
So now we know that the soil organisms have a vested
interest in growing a lush stand of plants. How do they do this? Again, we will
answer a question with a new question. What is the biggest problem facing the
plants? Plants need sun, water, air, and a good source of all the minerals and
micronutrients they need to grow. The first three are outside the control of
the soil organisms, but the last is fully within their control. There are two
primary sources for the nutrients the plants need: decaying plant and animal
material and the minerals in the soil around them. The soil needs to be
effective at releasing those nutrients from both sources and getting them to
the plants.
That brings up the next problem. How does the soil retain
the nutrients long enough for the plants to get them? Have you ever performed a
soil test? You put soil in a jar with water and shake it really well, then test
the water for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Why is that? Well, the
shaking is because the soil is working really hard to hold onto those
nutrients. You test the water and not the soil because those nutrients are
soluble in water. The soil has to find a way to lock those nutrients in, and
where they fail, filter them back out of the water before they are lost to the
water cycle.
It turns out that soil is remarkably good at doing just
that. The bacteria produce polysaccharide glues that hold soil particles
together. Fungal strands also serve to bind soil particles together. Fungal
networks are shaped like a tight net, and have proven to be very good at
filtering water.
Naturally, all this is a gross oversimplification, but it
has to be. There have been volumes written on tiny portions of this process.
There are whole fields of science that study nothing but soil chemistry and
biology. But when you think of the problems you have, think of what soil needs
to do and how a healthy, living soil can help you and your plants. Then go out
and feed your soil.
I focus quite a bit on the production of soil, trying to maintain healthy soil webs and vermiculture bins as well as some plants whose only purpose is for maintaining the health of the soil I produce when I have more of it than I can use. I really like your particular perspective here, and I think I'll adopt it, as it feels much more apporpriate somehow than when I would normally think about what I'm feeding the worms/fungi/bacteria.
ReplyDelete-Matt